I will start with a small question that I asked to my friends and would like to ask you as well. Don't worry it's a simple one, so here is the question : Will you support a minister who has submitted fake degrees? Clearly the answer I got was a big NO!.
Then i asked another question what if this person is a minister in AAP Delhi Government? Suddenly the answer changed to argument. Someone said its a conspiracy to defame AAP, it is a politics of vendetta and now the simple question became a topic of a debate.
I wondered what went wrong with my second question. Did i asked something wrong ? How come the perception became different by the background of the person doing wrong or by whose party he belongs to? Isn't it strange! But i will not say it is a fault of anybody. We belong to a society who thinks that a rich always do wrong, every policemen is corrupt and every member of AAP is honest and is a target of revenge politics.
If one person is found guilty of doing wrong we cant say that he is being targeted and many others are being left out. We have to start somewhere. Law takes it own course. How much time a person needs to show his original degrees if he has not done wrong. Why is the delay? Strange thing is that the party who was against malpractices is standing behind a person with fake degrees.
That's why I say its a curious case of the minister. We should not get blind folded by our support to the party and should think logically. Otherwise there will be no difference between people with fake degrees and original degrees.
If you want to see a tree growing you need to take care of the roots. If you let the infection grow in the roots, it doesn't matter how big the tree becomes it will not give good fruits and will fall one day. So lets water the plant with our support and keep a check on the infection.
Then i asked another question what if this person is a minister in AAP Delhi Government? Suddenly the answer changed to argument. Someone said its a conspiracy to defame AAP, it is a politics of vendetta and now the simple question became a topic of a debate.
I wondered what went wrong with my second question. Did i asked something wrong ? How come the perception became different by the background of the person doing wrong or by whose party he belongs to? Isn't it strange! But i will not say it is a fault of anybody. We belong to a society who thinks that a rich always do wrong, every policemen is corrupt and every member of AAP is honest and is a target of revenge politics.
If one person is found guilty of doing wrong we cant say that he is being targeted and many others are being left out. We have to start somewhere. Law takes it own course. How much time a person needs to show his original degrees if he has not done wrong. Why is the delay? Strange thing is that the party who was against malpractices is standing behind a person with fake degrees.
That's why I say its a curious case of the minister. We should not get blind folded by our support to the party and should think logically. Otherwise there will be no difference between people with fake degrees and original degrees.
If you want to see a tree growing you need to take care of the roots. If you let the infection grow in the roots, it doesn't matter how big the tree becomes it will not give good fruits and will fall one day. So lets water the plant with our support and keep a check on the infection.
No comments:
Post a Comment